National advisory panels for childhood cancer in the United Kingdom: An evaluation of current practice and a best practice statement for the future.

BACKGROUND: National advisory panels (NAPs) have been established for the care of children and young people (CYP) with cancer in the United Kingdom since 2011, with an increase in panel number in recent years. Their practice has not previously been reviewed; therefore, we sought to evaluate the role, practice and impact of six selected NAPs offering expertise in ependymoma, histiocytosis, leukaemia, neuroblastoma, renal tumours and sarcoma. PROCEDURE: This service evaluation used mixed methodology, including review of NAP documentation, semi-structured interviews with the NAP chairs and an analysis of the cases referred for discussion. RESULTS: Total 1110 referrals were analysed. Results demonstrated the significant scope and amount of work undertaken by the NAPs, largely testament to the commitment of the panel members. Specific roles fulfilled have been highlighted, and NAP recommendations have been shown to influence clinical decision-making and be implemented in the majority of cases. Despite widespread good practice, areas to address have been identified; these include clarity regarding NAP membership, consistency in recommendations, the consideration of holistic information to promote personalised management and the exploration of wider multidisciplinary team roles. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of increasing demand and the escalating number of NAPs, it is timely to consider how service improvement can be facilitated. Best practice guidelines have been formulated as a product of this study, to promote a sustainable and effective model for NAPs. Review and benchmarking national panel performance against these guidelines will drive high standards of care going forward and they should be embedded as standard practice.

Clinical and biological features prognostic of survival after relapse or progression of INRGSS stage MS pattern neuroblastoma: A report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) project.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes for patients with INRGSS metastatic special (MS) metastatic pattern neuroblastoma at initial diagnosis are well described. Prognosis after an initial event (relapse, progression, secondary malignancy) is unclear. METHODS: We investigated characteristics of MS pattern neuroblastoma patients in the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group database who subsequently experienced an event. Post-event overall survival (OS) ± standard error was calculated overall and by diagnosis era: before 2000 versus 2001 or after. Cox models were used to identify factors prognostic of post-event OS. RESULTS: Among 209 patients with an event, 88% were less than 365 days old at diagnosis; tumors were MYCN amplified in 24% and diploid in 33%. The median (range) time from diagnosis to first event was 8.16 months (7 days to 11.24 years). Of 96 patients with known relapse/progression pattern, 75% were metastatic or primary plus metastatic. Five-year post-event OS was 53% ± 3.6% and was higher for 2001 and afterwards (62% ± 5.0%) compared to before 2001 (44% ± 4.9%; p = .0046). In patients diagnosed in 2001 and after, older age, Hispanic ethnicity, MYCN amplification, 1p LOH, diploidy, high Mitotic Karyorrhexis Index, high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), unfavorable histology, and longer time to first event were prognostic of worse post-event OS. Independent adverse prognostic factors on multivariable testing were non-White race, MYCN amplification, and diploidy. SUMMARY: Patients diagnosed in and after 2001 have substantially better post-event OS compared to before 2001. In those diagnosed in and after 2001, most well-accepted prognostic factors for OS at diagnosis are also prognostic of post-event OS. Future studies may evaluate strategies to improve outcomes in this rare population.

Clinical utility of vinblastine therapeutic drug monitoring for the treatment of infantile myofibroma patients: A case series.

Infantile myofibroma is a rare, benign tumour of infancy typically managed surgically. In a minority of cases, more aggressive disease is seen and chemotherapy with vinblastine and methotrexate may be used, although evidence for this is limited. Chemotherapy dosing in infants is challenging, and vinblastine disposition in infants is unknown. We describe the use of vinblastine therapeutic drug monitoring in four cases of infantile myofibroma. Marked inter- and intrapatient variability was observed, highlighting the poorly understood pharmacokinetics of vinblastine in children, the challenges inherent in treating neonates, and the role of adaptive dosing in optimising drug exposure in challenging situations.

A C19MC-LIN28A-MYCN Oncogenic Circuit Driven by Hijacked Super-enhancers Is a Distinct Therapeutic Vulnerability in ETMRs: A Lethal Brain Tumor.

Embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes (ETMRs) are highly lethal infant brain cancers with characteristic amplification of Chr19q13.41 miRNA cluster (C19MC) and enrichment of pluripotency factor LIN28A. Here we investigated C19MC oncogenic mechanisms and discovered a C19MC-LIN28A-MYCN circuit fueled by multiple complex regulatory loops including an MYCN core transcriptional network and super-enhancers resulting from long-range MYCN DNA interactions and C19MC gene fusions. Our data show that this powerful oncogenic circuit, which entraps an early neural lineage network, is potently abrogated by bromodomain inhibitor JQ1, leading to ETMR cell death.

The UK Experience of a Treatment Strategy for Pediatric Metastatic Medulloblastoma Comprising Intensive Induction Chemotherapy, Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy and Response Directed High Dose Myeloablative Chemotherapy or Maintenance Chemotherapy (Milan Strategy).

BACKGROUND: Historically, the 5-year overall survival (OS) for metastatic medulloblastoma (MMB) was less than 40%. The strategy of post-operative induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) and response directed high dose chemotherapy (HDC) was reported in a single center study to improve 5-year OS to 73%. We report outcomes of this strategy in UK. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to all 20 UK pediatric oncology primary treatment centers to collect retrospective data on delivered treatment, toxicity and survival with this strategy in children aged 3-19 years with MMB. RESULTS: Between February 2009 and October 2011, 34 patients fulfilled the entry criteria of the original study. The median age was 7 years (range 3-15). Median interval from surgery to HART was 109 versus 85 days in the original series. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities with IC and HDC was 83-100%. All 16 patients who achieved complete response by the end of the regimen remain in remission but only three of 18 patients with lesser responses are still alive (P < 0.0001). With a median follow-up of 45 months for survivors, the estimated 3-year OS is 56% (95% CI 38, 71). This result is outside the 95% CI of the original study results and encompasses the historical survival result of 40%. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of statistical significance, we did not replicate the improved survival results reported in the original series. The reasons include differences in patient sub-groups and protocol administration. International randomized phase III studies are needed.

Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: outcome on UK national paediatric (ALL97) and adult (UKALLXII/E2993) trials.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) have languished in the shadow of success of the outcome of therapy in childhood ALL. Their treatment has always been incorporated into either paediatric or adult clinical trials depending on the mode of referral and hence there is a need to address an age and risk specific strategy for improving the outcome of this neglected group of patients. This article has summarised the recent and updated retrospective comparative analysis of adolescents treated on the Medical Research Council (MRC) trials. This analysis adds further emphasis to the treatment approach and the merits and limitations of treatment of adolescents on paediatric and adult trials. METHODS: A retrospective comparative analysis of adolescents aged 15-17 years, treated on either MRC ALL97/revised 99 (n = 61), a randomised paediatric trial or UKALLXII/E2993 (n = 67), an adult trial, between 1997 and 2002 was undertaken. RESULT: Results suggest a trend towards a superior outcome on paediatric trials. The 5-year EFS on ALL97 was 65% (95% CI = 52-78%) and on UKALLXII/E2993 was 49% (95% CI = 37-61%; P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis allowing for age and Ph status, diminished the EFS difference, but confirmed a reduced rate of death in remission in patients managed on the paediatric protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations in the methodology, comparative studies including our MRC study suggest a consistent advantage for adolescents managed intensively on paediatric trials. Redefining age limits with risk-based strategy and multi-centre collaboration should be considered to improve the survival of young adults.

Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: emerging from the shadow of paediatric and adult treatment protocols.

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) constitute a distinct population from children and older adults. Based on patterns of referral, they may be treated by either paediatric or adult oncologists. As a group, AYA with ALL have a worse survival and event-free survival (EFS) compared to that achieved by younger children. A systematic review of all published clinical trials, which provide data on treatment and outcome of adolescents with ALL, has been summarised in an effort to determine whether they should be treated on paediatric or adult type protocols. Adolescents appear to have a consistent survival advantage when treated on paediatric regimens.